Mandatory Reconsideration vs Tribunal: Which Is Better?
When you’re challenging a PIP decision, you go through two stages: Mandatory Reconsideration first, then Tribunal. Here’s how they compare.
Comparison
| Feature | Mandatory Reconsideration | Tribunal |
|---|---|---|
| Who decides? | The DWP (same organisation) | Independent panel (judge + doctor) |
| Success rate | ~15-20% | ~64% |
| Cost | Free | Free |
| Timeline | 2-8 weeks | 3-9 months from submission |
| Format | Paper-based review | Hearing (in person, phone, or video) |
| Can you attend? | No | Yes (and you should) |
| DWP present? | N/A (internal review) | No (DWP don’t attend) |
Why MR Has a Low Success Rate
Mandatory Reconsideration is reviewed by the same department that made the original decision. They rarely overturn their own decisions. Don’t be discouraged if your MR fails — this is normal.
Why Tribunal Is So Effective
The tribunal is completely independent. The panel includes a qualified judge and a medical professional who understand disability. They hear your case properly and apply the reliability test correctly. That’s why 64% of appeals succeed.
Should You Go to Tribunal?
Almost always yes. The success rate speaks for itself. The process is free, the panel is sympathetic, and many people say it’s less stressful than dealing with the DWP directly.